Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $29.18 vs $182.06
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - 119 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75660 minutes ago
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75661 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
32.95519001701645%
Multi-Core
992
10.836792658946909%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |