Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1703 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3900 - 194 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75921 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
33.21898227558605%
Multi-Core
992
10.826148641274692%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |