Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $51.18 vs $314.41
- Up to 66% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-10900K - $0.53 vs $1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 110% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G3900 - 225 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
107
47%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Buy for €349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |