Buy on Amazon
€41.18
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7740X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7740X is 664 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-7740X - $37.1 vs $168.5
- Up to 77% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Core i7-7740X - $0.14 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7740X - 51 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7740X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7740X
- Performs up to 4% better in Resident Evil Village than Celeron G3900 - 303 vs 292 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
292
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.18
100%
Value Winner
Intel CPU BX80662G3900 Celeron G3900 2.80Ghz 2M LGA1151 2C/2T Skylake Retail
Buy for €41.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Core i7-7740X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
303
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
22%
Price, €
€187.04
22%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-7740X X-Series Processor 4 Cores up to 4.50GHz Turbo Unlocked FCLGA2066 X299 Series 112W
Buy for €187.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-7740X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 112 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.