Buy on Amazon
€32.39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T and the cheaper Celeron G3900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $29.18 vs $81.24
- Up to 59% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-6700T - $0.07 vs $0.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 16% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G3900 - 531 vs 459 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
459
86.4406779661017%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
531
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
41.1764705882353%
Price, €
€90.18
35%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €90.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
49.112426035502956%
Multi-Core
992
27.81828379136287%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.