Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - $29.18 vs $43.14
- Up to 32% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3450 - $0.13 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 1% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3900 - 255 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
252
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18551 minutes ago
Buy for €47.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18551 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |