Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2400 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2400 is 1696 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G3900 - 180 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $25.56 vs $29.18
- Up to 11% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G3900 - $0.16 vs $0.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4879 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €28.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4879 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |