Buy on Amazon
€32.39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $29.18 vs $138.2
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 25% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3900 - 260 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for €153.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
26.578225068618483%
Multi-Core
992
11.563119244667211%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.