Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $29.18 vs $102.37
- Up to 68% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600 - $0.17 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 12% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 213 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
89.67136150234741%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1797 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
32.075471698113205%
Price, €
€113.63
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1802 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
27.379830348727612%
Multi-Core
992
12.115290669272106%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |