Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $29.18 vs $95.17
- Up to 64% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-10400 - $0.05 vs $0.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 12% better in Valorant than Celeron G3900 - 778 vs 694 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
694
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
778
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
35%
Price, €
€105.64
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €105.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |