Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $29.18 vs $84.08
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 11% better in Valorant than Celeron G3900 - 772 vs 694 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75058 minutes ago
Buy for €93.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75059 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
42.28529839883552%
Multi-Core
992
27.03733987462524%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |