Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7350K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7350K is 490 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 51 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 5% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G3900 - 312 vs 298 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $37.73 vs $40.32
- Up to 13% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G3900 - $0.13 vs $0.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €44.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
312
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |