Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2063 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-530 - 117 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i3-530 - $29.18 vs $32.9
- Up to 12% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-530 - $0.28 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 51 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18206 minutes ago
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |