Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1458 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i3-2120T - $29.18 vs $43.86
- Up to 33% better value when playing Control than Core i3-2120T - $0.16 vs $0.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16122 minutes ago
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |