Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2682 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G3900 - 150 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
140
93.33333333333333%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
25.50482879719052%
Multi-Core
992
12.814881798217284%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |