Buy on Amazon
€32.39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $899
Availability
MSRP in USD: $899
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1095 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $29.18 vs $786.04
- Up to 96% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.05 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than Celeron G3900 - 709 vs 678 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
678
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
709
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
4%
Price, €
€872.5
3%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Processor (YD295XA8AFWOF)
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.