Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $51.18 vs $288.82
- Up to 38% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.85 vs $1.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 251% better in League of Legends than Celeron G3900 - 235 vs 67 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
67
28%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Buy for €320.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |