Buy on Amazon
€32.39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 961 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $29.18 vs $153.55
- Up to 79% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.32 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 11% better in New World than Celeron G3900 - 111 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
100
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16976 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
20%
Price, €
€170.44
19%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.