Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 895 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $29.18 vs $95.05
- Up to 68% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.28 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3900 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
31%
Price, €
€105.51
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |