Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 695 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $51.18 vs $287.72
- Up to 80% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 3 1200 - $1.24 vs $6.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 13% better in Starfield than Celeron G3900 - 52 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
46
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Buy for €319.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |