Buy on Amazon
€32.39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1282 days newer than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than FX-6200 - 145 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than FX-6200 - $29.18 vs $31.32
- Up to 8% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-6200 - $0.22 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18850 minutes ago
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18849 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.