Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1541 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 14% better in War Thunder than Celeron G3900 - 155 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
136
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |