Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 1794 days newer than Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-950 - 109 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
FPS
108
99.08256880733946%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2499 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |