Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 54% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6405 - $33.94 vs $73.09
- Up to 52% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Pentium Gold G6405 - $0.14 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 53 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 3% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1820 - 281 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
274
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
48%
Price, €
€81.13
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |