Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1424 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Pentium G6950 - 319 vs 314 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 53 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 19% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - $27.41 vs $33.94
- Up to 17% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1820 - $0.1 vs $0.12 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
314
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Haswell | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |