Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 1783 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $33.94 vs $406.54
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 19% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1820 - 130 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76510 minutes ago
Buy for €451.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76511 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
32.997311827956985%
Multi-Core
825
8.669609079445145%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |