Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 2956 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $33.94 vs $265.41
- Up to 86% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-12900F - $0.19 vs $1.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 11% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G1820 - 216 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
195
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
13%
Price, €
€294.61
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €294.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |