Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $33.94 vs $169.64
- Up to 70% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-11900KF - $0.24 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 52% better in Rust than Celeron G1820 - 237 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
156
65%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
30%
Price, €
€188.3
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |