Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1783 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $33.94 vs $182.06
- Up to 79% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-9700K - $0.2 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 53 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1820 - 209 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
191
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
20%
Price, €
€202.09
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |