Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 912 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $33.94 vs $87.75
- Up to 57% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-6900K - $0.06 vs $0.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1820 - 709 vs 674 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
674
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |