Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1864 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $33.94 vs $62.15
- Up to 43% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-9400F - $0.25 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1820 - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
149
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |