Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $33.94 vs $99.8
- Up to 61% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11400 - $0.34 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1820 - 127 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
111
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
39%
Price, €
€110.78
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €110.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |