Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - $33.94 vs $89.94
- Up to 13% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-10600KF - $0.75 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 132% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron G1820 - 116 vs 50 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
50
43%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
87%
Price, €
€99.83
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €99.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |