Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $33.94 vs $103.46
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10600K - $0.32 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 53 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1820 - 136 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
116
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
38%
Price, €
€114.84
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €114.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |