Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $33.94 vs $95.17
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-10400 - $0.26 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1820 - 162 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
144
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
40%
Price, €
€105.64
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €105.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |