Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1129 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $33.94 vs $45.33
- Up to 17% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-7100 - $0.15 vs $0.18 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1820 - 272 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 51 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
253
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Buy for €50.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |