Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1369 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $33.94 vs $80.42
- Up to 57% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.13 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil Village than Celeron G1820 - 298 vs 292 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
292
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
43%
Price, €
€89.27
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |