Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2531 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $33.94 vs $263.43
- Up to 75% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.55 vs $2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 97% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron G1820 - 134 vs 68 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
68
50%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Buy for €292.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |