Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2336 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $33.94 vs $69.46
- Up to 31% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.29 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 39% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1820 - 184 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
132
71%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Buy for €77.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |