Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 404 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than FX-6300 - 214 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than FX-6300 - $28.95 vs $71.68
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €32.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Buy for €79.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |