Buy on Amazon
€59.13
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 2705 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 55 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 3% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G1620 - 464 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel PENTIUM Gold G6400 Processor 4.0GHZ 2NUCLEOS 4THREADS 4MB Cache Graphics UHD 610 LGA 1200 BX80701G6400
Buy for €59.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75784 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
50.80745341614907%
Multi-Core
723
43.319352905931694%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.