Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 546 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 256 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 53 vs 55 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €41.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76348 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |