Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2332 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $35.83 vs $488.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 29% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G1620 - 135 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Buy for €541.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
25.387957790192427%
Multi-Core
723
10.036091060521931%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |