Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1767 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - $35.83 vs $89.94
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G1620 - 222 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Buy for €99.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
26.45536869340233%
Multi-Core
723
12.917634447025192%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |