Buy on Amazon
€39.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $35.83 vs $87.02
- Up to 56% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-7400 - $0.08 vs $0.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1620 - 526 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
503
95.62737642585552%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
526
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
44.44444444444445%
Price, €
€96.59
41%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5 i5-7400 Quad-core (4 Core) 3 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack (D132)
Buy for €96.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.77891156462585%
Multi-Core
723
22.370049504950494%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.