Buy on Amazon
€146.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $196
Availability
MSRP in USD: $196
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 287 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i5-14400F Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for €146.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76349 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
17.404255319148938%
Multi-Core
723
6.364996918742848%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.