Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2332 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $35.83 vs $62.15
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G1620 - 277 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
29.767103347889375%
Multi-Core
723
19.70564186426819%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |