Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 19% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1620 - 164 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |