Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $35.83 vs $66.15
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 31% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G1620 - 202 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Buy for €73.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
16.412520064205456%
Multi-Core
723
8.627684964200476%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |