Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 456 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G530 - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G530 - 55 vs 65 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
