Buy on Amazon
€155.37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9370 is 190 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 55 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1620 - 109 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-9370 Octa-core (8 Core) 4.40 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+Retail Pack
Buy for €155.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76521 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.